Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 WR Review

I’ve used the XF 23mm f/2 extensively on the Fujifilm X-T5, side-by-side with the Fujifilm X100VI, and alongside Fujifilm’s other 23mm options — including the Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 WR.

This review isn’t theoretical. It’s based on real shooting in the Philippines, travel use, street photography, and close comparison against the X100VI’s fixed lens — including tripod tests, distance shots, close-focus work, and everyday carry. If you are considering which Fujifilm lenses to buy then I’ve written an article on the best lenses for Fuji specifically for travel photography.

TL;DR: The XF 23mm f/2 WR is compact, weather-sealed, fast to focus, and a pleasure to carry. It’s not the sharpest 23mm Fujifilm makes, and it can look a little nervous wide open — but as a lightweight everyday lens, it delivers far more than its size suggests.

This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase through them, it helps support the site at no extra cost to you.

Why the 23mm focal length works so well on Fuji

A photo of a silhouetted young girl looking out to sea at sunset. Taken on the Fujifilm 23mm 1.4WR lens

On APS-C, a 23mm lens gives you a 35mm-equivalent field of view — and for me, that focal length sits right in the sweet spot. It’s wide enough to give scenes context, but not so wide that people become secondary or distorted. You can include environment, atmosphere, and background detail, while still keeping your subject firmly at the centre of the frame.

That balance is the reason 35mm has been such a classic focal length for decades, and it’s why I keep coming back to 23mm on Fujifilm cameras. It feels natural. You don’t have to fight it, and you don’t have to overthink composition. What you see is broadly what you get, which makes it incredibly well suited to the way most of us actually shoot.

For travel photography, it’s almost ideal. You can shoot wide scenes without needing to step back too far, but you can also move in close and tell more personal stories. Markets, street scenes, cafés, transport, everyday life — the 23mm focal length lets you move fluidly between wider context shots and more intimate moments without ever needing to change lenses. When I’m travelling light, this is exactly the kind of flexibility I want.

Street photography is another natural fit. With a 23mm lens, you’re encouraged to be part of the scene rather than observing from a distance. You have to get closer, which often leads to more engaging images. At the same time, it’s not so wide that everything feels chaotic or hard to frame. You can isolate a person within their surroundings and still retain a sense of place, which is something longer focal lengths often lose.

For photographing family moments, especially children, 23mm works brilliantly. Kids move fast, environments change quickly, and moments come and go without warning. A slightly wider field of view gives you breathing room — you’re less likely to clip limbs, miss expressions, or end up too tight when things happen suddenly. At the same time, you’re still close enough to feel involved, rather than standing back and observing from afar. I’ve written a full article if you’re looking for the best Fujfilm lenses for family photography.

Environmental portraits are another area where this focal length shines. A 23mm lens lets you show not just who someone is, but where they are. Their surroundings become part of the story rather than a blurred backdrop. Used thoughtfully, it creates images that feel grounded and honest rather than overly stylised or isolated. Here is my article on the best portrait lenses for Fujifilm.

This is also the focal length I naturally gravitate toward when I want to tell a story rather than chase separation or subject isolation. There’s always a temptation to reach for faster lenses or longer focal lengths to blur backgrounds and make images look more “impressive,” but that isn’t always what makes a photograph meaningful. With 23mm, you’re encouraged to think about relationships — between people and place, subject and environment, moment and context.

That’s why, when I want one lens to document real life, I keep coming back to this focal length. It doesn’t shout. It doesn’t force a particular look. It simply gives you enough of everything to work with, which is exactly what you want from an everyday lens.

And that context is important when talking about the XF 23mm f/2 specifically. This lens isn’t trying to be the best. It’s designed to be a dependable, everyday companion — the kind of lens you leave on your camera because it works in most situations without getting in the way. Understanding the strengths of the 23mm focal length helps explain why this lens, despite its limitations on paper, still makes so much sense in real-world use.

SpecificationDetail
Focal Length23mm (35mm equivalent ~35mm)
Maximum Aperturef/2
Minimum Aperturef/16
Lens Construction9 elements in 7 groups
Angle of ViewApprox. 63°
Minimum Focus Distance0.22m (8.7 in)
Maximum Magnification0.14x
AutofocusYes (internal focusing motor)
Weather SealingYes (WR)
Filter Thread43mm
Dimensions66.5mm × 46.9mm
WeightApprox. 180g

Build quality & handling

The Fujifilm 23mm f2 lens mounted on the Fuji X-T5 camera and seen from the top view. Photo is taken on a black background.

The XF 23mm f/2 WR is part of Fujifilm’s small f/2 prime trio.

This is a lens that’s clearly designed around practicality rather than chasing ultimate image quality. It’s compact and light at around 180g, properly weather sealed, and focuses quickly and quietly. Mounted on a body like the X-T5 or one of the X-Pro cameras, it feels balanced and unobtrusive, never front-heavy or awkward. It doesn’t change the handling of the camera in any meaningful way, which is exactly what you want from an everyday lens.

In use, this is very much a “forget it’s there” kind of lens. You can carry the camera all day without feeling weighed down, and when you’re travelling or walking for hours, that matters far more than a few extra percentage points of sharpness. The camera feels like a camera again, not a system you’re constantly aware of.

One thing I really appreciate is that Fujifilm chose to include aperture rings on its f/2 primes. They don’t quite have the same damped, confidence-inspiring feel as the rings on the red badge lenses like the 23mm f/1.4 WR, but they work well enough and add to the overall shooting experience. On bodies like the X-T5, it means you can physically control shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation without diving into menus — which is a big part of why I enjoy shooting Fujifilm in the first place.

Taken together, the build, size, and handling all reinforce what this lens is trying to be: a dependable, everyday tool that encourages you to take the camera out more often, rather than leaving it at home because it feels like too much effort.

Autofocus performance

Autofocus is one of this lens’s strengths.

  • Fast and decisive in good light
  • Reliable for street and everyday movement
  • Pairs well with Fuji’s latest AF systems

Compared directly:

  • It focuses faster than the X100VI’s lens
  • It’s excellent for candid work and family photography

For real-world shooting, autofocus is not a limitation here. it keeps up when I’m shooting my children or candid shots on the street. Combined with the autofocus on my X-T5 I never feel that the 23mm f/2 limits me.

Image Quality

Comparison between the Fuji 23mm f/2 lens and the Fujfilm X100VI at f/2.
As you can see from the above shot, the Fuji 23mm f2 wide open isn’t as sharp as the X100VI

Let’s get the main thing out of the way first: the Fujifilm 23mm f/2 isn’t the sharpest lens Fujifilm makes — and it isn’t even the sharpest lens in the small “Fujicron” family of f/2 primes.

If you compare it directly to the 35mm f/2, the 23mm f/1.4 WR, or even the fixed lens on the X100VI, those lenses all have more bite. They’re crisper wide open, they resolve a bit more fine detail, and they generally look more impressive if you start zooming in and pixel peeping.

But that doesn’t mean the 23mm f/2 is a bad lens. Not at all.

I’d describe it as sharp enough for real-world photography — which sounds like faint praise, but actually matters more than charts or lab tests. In normal use, I never look at images from this lens and think they look soft or mushy. Wide open at f/2, details are generally sharp enough, faces look clean, and contrast is perfectly acceptable. It just doesn’t blow you away in the way some other Fuji lenses do.

Comparison shots from the Fujifilm 23mm f/2 lens and the Fujifilm X100VI at f/5.6.
The 23mm f/2 (left) catches up by the time you stop down to f/5.6.

Stop the lens down slightly — as most of us naturally do for street photography — and everything tightens up nicely. At f/4 or f/5.6 the lens looks genuinely sharp across most of the frame, and for travel, documentary, and everyday shooting it holds up extremely well. Landscapes, architecture, environmental portraits — all absolutely fine.

There is a bit of green fringing that can show itself in high-contrast scenes, particularly around edges or backlit subjects. That said, it’s generally well controlled, and in practice Fujifilm’s in-camera corrections and modern RAW processing take care of most of it without any effort. It’s there if you go looking for it, but it’s rarely something that ruins a shot.

Bokeh isn’t the strongest aspect of this lens either. At times, especially in busy backgrounds, out-of-focus areas can look a little nervous compared to the smoother rendering you get from the 23mm f/1.4 WR or the X100VI lens. That said, wide open it still does an admirable job for a small f/2 prime, and in most real shooting situations the background separation looks perfectly reasonable.

More importantly, the overall rendering is consistent and predictable. Colours look natural, contrast is balanced, and images have that familiar Fujifilm look that works well for people, travel, and everyday life. It may not have loads of character, but it also doesn’t get in the way of the photograph — and for this kind of lens, that’s arguably the point.

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 WR

A compact, weather-sealed 35mm-equivalent prime that pairs beautifully with Fujifilm X-series bodies.

Check latest price

🛒 This is an affiliate link. If you use it, it helps support the site at no extra cost to you.

Conclusion

The Fujifilm 23mm f/2 is a good lens — not a great one — and I think that’s actually its strength. Image quality is perfectly usable wide open and improves noticeably once you stop it down. Autofocus is quick and reliable enough to keep up with most everyday subjects, and while it doesn’t lead the pack in sharpness or rendering, it never feels like it’s holding you back either. What really sets it apart is that it gives us something many other manufacturers simply don’t: a small, lightweight, weather-sealed prime at a reasonable price. Personally, I prefer both the 23mm f/1.4 WR and the lens on the X100VI, as they deliver a higher level of image quality and refinement. But for anyone who doesn’t want to spend that extra money — or carry the extra size and weight — the 23mm f/2 remains very good value and performs admirably where it actually matters: out in the real world, being used.

About Me

I’m David Fleet, a British full-time photographer and content creator based in the Philippines. I began my photography journey as a professional landscape photographer in 2008 and have since worked across Asia, Europe, and beyond. Over the years I’ve shot with nearly every major camera system — including Fujifilm, Nikon, Canon, Sony, Panasonic, OM System, and Ricoh — always focusing on real-world use rather than lab tests.

Here’s my complete Fujifilm gear list, covering every Fuji camera and lens I’ve owned and used over the years.

Brand or PR enquiries: get in touch or view my Media & Press Information.

If you’d like to follow along more closely, I also share occasional emails reflecting on photography, gear, and life. As I prepare to move back to Scotland after a decade in Southeast Asia, it’s a quiet space to share perspective from working with familiar tools in new environments.

Follow the journey

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 WR

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 sharp enough?

Yes — it’s sharp enough for real-world travel, street, and family photography. It’s not the sharpest 23mm in Fuji’s lineup wide open at f/2, but once you stop down to around f/4–f/5.6 it tightens up noticeably and looks genuinely sharp across most of the frame.

How does it compare to the X100VI’s fixed lens?

The X100VI lens looks crisper wide open, but the XF 23mm f/2 focuses faster. In practice, the gap in sharpness matters most if you’re pixel-peeping at f/2. For everyday shooting, both deliver strong results — they just trade priorities (image refinement vs. speed and flexibility).

Is autofocus good for kids, candid moments, and street photography?

Yes. Autofocus is one of this lens’s strengths — it’s fast, quiet, and reliable for everyday movement. Paired with a body like the X-T5, it keeps up well for family life and candid street shooting.

Does the 23mm focal length work well for travel photography?

It’s one of the most useful “one lens” focal lengths on APS-C. You get a 35mm-equivalent field of view, which is wide enough for context and atmosphere, but still natural for people and everyday scenes — perfect for markets, cafés, transport, and general documentary travel.

Is the XF 23mm f/2 weather-sealed?

Yes — it’s a WR lens, designed to handle bad weather far better than most small primes. That weather sealing is a big part of why it’s such a practical everyday option.

Is bokeh good on the XF 23mm f/2?

It’s decent, but it’s not the lens’s standout feature. In busier backgrounds, out-of-focus areas can look a bit nervous compared to the smoother rendering of the XF 23mm f/1.4 WR or the X100VI lens. For a compact f/2 prime, though, it does a respectable job.

Does it have issues with fringing?

It can show a bit of green fringing in high-contrast scenes (especially edges and backlit subjects), but it’s generally well controlled. In practice, in-camera corrections and normal RAW processing tend to remove most of it quickly.

Should I buy the XF 23mm f/2 or the XF 23mm f/1.4 WR?

If you want the best image quality and more refined rendering, the XF 23mm f/1.4 WR is the better lens — but it’s bigger, heavier, and more expensive. If you want a small, lightweight, weather-sealed everyday lens that you’ll actually carry everywhere, the XF 23mm f/2 makes a lot of sense.

What kind of lens is this in real-world terms?

It’s a “leave it on the camera” lens: compact, practical, fast to focus, and dependable. It isn’t trying to be the most impressive option on paper — it’s trying to make you take the camera out more often, and for that, it succeeds.

Is the XF 23mm f/2 good value?

Yes. You’re getting a compact, weather-sealed prime at a reasonable price, with autofocus that’s genuinely strong. If you don’t want the cost or size of the f/1.4, it’s still a very sensible buy.

Leave a Comment